This short note will introduce you to the key takeways about microfluidic T junction among other microfluidic junctions. A focus will be given to the use of microfluidic T junction for droplet generation.
The most common geometries for two-phase mixing (droplet or bubble generation) in microfluidic junction devices are:
The geometry of the intersection where the two phases meet, flow rates and fluid properties (surface tension, viscosity) determine the local stresses that deform the interface and lead to the generation of the two-phase mixture (emulsion, foams).
Microfluidic T-junction devices can be made of various materials such as PDMS, Glass, Quartz or even Platinum and designed for a broad range of applications including mixing fluids, microreactions and droplet formation.
T-junction is one of the most common microfluidic geometry employed to generate two-phase mixture such as emulsion based on droplet-based microfluidics as initially proposed by Thorsen et al. in 2001 [2].
The formation of droplets in microfluidic T-junction can be described as the meeting of a continuous phase (Water or Oil) that flows through a channel, while a dispersed phase (Water or Oil) is flowing through a perpendicular channel. The resulting emulsion properties will reply importantly on the channel geometry, flow rate ratio and device surface properties [3].
There are three regimes for microfluidic droplet generation with a T-junction defined by the ratio of two forces acting on the interface deformation: the shear stress versus the surface tension, known as the Capillary number (Ca):
Find below a selection of three short videos representing droplet generation though microfluidic T or Y junction. If you’re interested in reproducing this methods, check our related application pack that contains all you need to start microfluidic droplet generation in your lab.
Literature in the field of droplet microfluidics by Thorsen et al. [2] and Tice et al. [4] show that the detachment of microfluidic droplets is due to the existing competition between surface tension that keeps the dispersed phase in its channel and viscous forces that tend to detach the microfluidic droplet by the shear stress.
The evolution of the capillary number (also dependent on the radius R of microfluidic droplets) will determine when the droplet detaches from the liquid stream at a critical capillary number.
Garstecki et al’s work [5] described very well the behavior of microfluidic droplet generation at low capillary number. It was showed that during its droplet generation evolution, the dispersed phase tends to “clog” the main channel.
Therefore, the presence of the dispersed phase in the main channel locally lowers the pressure in the channel. When the pressure drop across the disperse phase becomes too large, a microfluidic droplet detaches.
The dispersed phase following the flow of the continuous phase and the two immiscible fluids, goes side by side in the main channel and breaks.
The breaking and resulting droplet production occurs beyond the intersection between the two phases. The jetting regime generates small microfluidic droplets. However, the jetting regime is not reached easily.
This regime is also in restricted parameter controls. Furthermore, very small microfluidic droplets relative to the diameter of the microchannel tends to cause chaotic jetting regimes [6].
Regardless of the mode in which you work, the size of the microfluidic droplets formed is proportional to the flow rates of the two phases of the report. In general, it is preferable to be in a situation where the microfluidic droplets are completely non-wetting on the walls of the microfluidic channels. Flow control of each phase by the pressure controller can produce droplets with a high level of monodispersity. Piezoelectric pressure microfluidic generators are the most efficient pressure regulators to control the flow and the generation of droplets, if you want more information about it, click here.
Standard droplet generation with a T-junction can be performed with Elveflow Droplet Pack. The Droplet Pack setup uses 2-channel pumping system to flow independantly dispersed and continuous phases inside the microfluidic chip, enabling water in oil (W/O) or oil in water (O/W) droplets to be generated. The droplet size will be determined by the chip channel size and the flow rate ratio of both phases. Flow rates can be monitored and controlled thanks to our versatile flow rate sensors (MFS or BFS series).
For more information about this setup, feel free to contact our team of experts!
Email* I hereby agree than Elveflow uses my personal data
Do you want tips on how to best set up your microfluidic experiment? Do you need inspiration or a different angle to take on your specific problem? Well, we probably have an application note just for you, feel free to check them out!
Revolutionizing Microfluidics with Acoustic Particle Manipulation
Fluid mixing at microscale is of importance for many fields of application. This short review summarises the key takeaway aspects of fluid mixing at microscale.
In the past two years, several new microfluidic syringe pump systems have changed the use of syringe pumps in microfluidic experiments.
This review presents a few examples of applications where magnetic flux sources, magnetic particles and microfluidics are combined in order to perform particle sorting and handling.
In microfluidic laminar flows, traditional turbulent mixing between two liquids cannot occur. However, controllable and fast mixing is critical for microfluidic and lab-on-chip devices. So different mixing techniques were developed and are here presented.
There are three main classes of systems to control liquid motion in microfluidic and nanofluidic devices.
One of the great challenges for researchers using microfluidics is miniaturizing analysis processes in very small microchip.
Microfluidic flow controllers are designed to control flows in microfluidic chips.
Despite their sturdiness & simplicity, syringe pumps are often problematic in microfluidics.
The performance of your flow control instruments depends on your experimental conditions.
Liquid flow sensors are a compulsory element of microfluidic systems requiring a control of the sample volume dispensed and/or, obviously, the sample flow rate.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each type of microfluidic flow control system? Pressure controller, syringe pump...?
Fast medium switch in microfluidic channels is generally a required technique to perform a wide range of biomedical and chemical microfluidic assays, such as the analysis of living cells in vitro, particle washing, etc.
Outside of conventional syringe pumps which generate flow oscillation at low flow rate and long settling time, we can now find syringe pumps like the NE-1002X which is dedicated to microfluidic experiments.
Common syringe pumps have two major drawbacks when it comes to research in MICROFLUIDICS: RESPONSIVENESS and flow OSCILLATION/PULSATILE FLOW. Recently, some syringe pump manufacturers have developed...
Get a quote
Name*
Email*
Message
Newsletter subscription
We will answer within 24 hours
By filling in your info you accept that we use your data.
Collaborations
Need customer support?
Serial Number of your product
Support Type AdviceHardware SupportSoftware Support
Subject*
I hereby agree that Elveflow uses my personal data Newsletter subscription
How can we help you?
Message I hereby agree that Elveflow uses my personal data Newsletter subscription