Analogy with AN electrical circuit
There are two main ways to generate flows.
In the field of microfluidics, flow behavior is quite similar to electrical current behavior. Just like a current source and voltage source are the two main ways to generate an electrical current, microfluidic researchers have to choose between flow controller and pressure controller to command their flow in their experiments (For instance Darwin Microfluidics offers syringe pumps for microfluidics)
In microfluidics, the most widely used technology is the syringe pump. This method is strongly relevant for a lot of applications and is appreciated for its fast setup, simplicity and affordability. Pressure control is used for experiments requiring a short response time or a high level of stability and accuracy.
Microfluidic droplets generation
   Â
Researchers’ opinion
We asked a hundred of researchers from laboratories working on droplet-based microfluidics which technology they used to control their flows in their latest papers, and their opinion about it.
Choice of technology for droplet-based microfluidics
A significant majority of researchers uses syringe pump technology to control flows in their experiments related to droplet generation. Their choice of technology mainly depends on their opinion on syringe pumps, their habits of experimentation and equipment of their laboratory.
In the 1/4th of pressure control users, several of them have recently moved to pressure-driven control technology, or are still using the two technologies at the same time.
Lastly, some of researchers interviewed built their own homemade system using hydrostatic pressure or pressurized containers with valves.

(*)This study is based on the kind answers given by researchers in the field of droplets-based microfluidics [3-30]
Pros and Cons of flow control and pressure control for droplet generation
PROS
Syringe pump
-
- Ease of setup and control
- Using a syringe pump allows to know and specify the flow rate
- Commercial availability: variety of providers
Pressure control
CONS
Syringe pump
-
- Long response time of the flow rate (seconds to minutes)
- The piston of the syringe pump generates oscillations at low flow rate: droplets are irregularly dispersed [4]
- Fluidic resistance rises could lead to pressure increase and burst the device
- The amount of dispensed fluid is usually reduced around tens of mL
- Incompatible with a valve-based closing system
Pressure control
-
- Using a pressure controller does not allow to know the flow rate (*)
- The flow rate varies with fluidic resistance when controlling flow in pressure [3] (*)
(*) can be overcome with pressure source including flow rate feedback loop
You can also check out a detailed review by one of our distributors, Elexan, comparing syringe pumps and pressure controllers for droplet generation in microfluidics.
Reviews on droplets generation:
How to generate droplets in capillary tubes & junction step by step
How to generate droplets in on-chip channels step by step
For more details about flow control in microfluidics, also see this document.
This review about droplet generation in microfluidics have been written by Thomas Grandry.